ESTHETIC TRUTH & TRUTHFUL ESTHETICS

By Franz J. T. Lee

May 29, 2001

 It is not so much a matter of being useful, of utilitarianism; not of being social paradigms for anyone; not even of making a contribution to "humanity", of being human, humane, humanistic; au contraire, it is a natural, social and historic necessity of emancipatory excellence.

We are not trying to be "great", to feel "great", to perform "great" acts, and to develop "great" theories, that would further "human" knowledge and health, that would gain global glory, world renown, venerated Nobel prizes, or even entrance into the Book of Guinness or the Kingdom of Heaven, on the contrary, we just want to live happily, be joyful, be beautiful to ourselves, be amiable, amicable, enlightened, be truthful, knowledgeable, wise, loving, lovingly, loveable; and, of course, be able to acquire the necessary material and social means to survive in a human butchery, in the Labour Moloch.

These are the most complicated, arduous topics to discuss with billions these days, and yet, for us, it's like sucking delicious nectar from a beautiful honeysuckle.

About all these things we'll chat joyfully together.

********************************************************

TRUTHFUL ESTHETICS

What an interesting question - what are our Science & Philosophy & Emancipation all about?

Relating somehow the Level & Degree & Mension of this query, let's ask: What are our Objectives & Subjectives & Transjectives?

The Answer, relating again: Beauty & Truth & Love.

To what are all these related? Relating again the answer, to: Nature & Society & History.

And, to what are these again related? Well, to: Cosmos & Einai & Nothing.

This is the scientific-philosophic-emancipatory context (relation), in which we will conduct our chat, our debate, our discussion today.

Let's commence today with our Objective. Next time we will discuss our Subjective, Truth!

An Objective, what is it? What is it in the Labour Process, in the Patria, in everyday language and in common, popular connotation?

This is very easy, very simple to answer. After all, objectives are the only things which we have in our fatherland, in this world, in this unilinear, unilateral reality. We just have basic objectives, and that's it. They are: the four D's: Depredation (economic). Domination (political), Discrimination (social) and Deprivation (human).

These are the objective quintessences of our materialistic world, of our global system, of our New World Order. To obtain these objective goals, aims and ends, like slaves, billions work, labour and toil themselves to death.

So, what is generally understood by an object? A perceptible physical body or thing; a thing or conception (Nature) towards which 'the action of the thinking mind' (intellectual labour) , considered as 'subject', is directed.

Of course, it also has a social meaning: "Why is Franz the object of such strong popular dislike?" The answer: "Simply because he excites negative attention and emotion."

Of course, Franz could also "object", could objectify himself.

Furthermore, he could use an object glass to study an object ball. Filled with revolutionary objectivism, he could capture and destroy the objective, the state house. These are examples of objects and objectives in our wonderful world.

Obviously, they have nothing to do with our Objectives, with Beauty. Let us elaborate our conception of Objective Beauty.

According to our Emancipatory Esthetics (aisthesis), Beauty is not "skin-deep", rather it is "in the eyes of the beholder", in her/his acts, actions and activities, being reflected as natural Sensatio, by cosmic, sensorial perception. It is natural, is praxical; is our emancipatory objective.

Scientific Beauty affirms itself, becoming part and parcel of Philosophical Truth; as such, as "contradiction", it exists as Beauty a n d Truth; it (is a n d ) exists as Truth. Furthermore, it transcends, excels as Emancipatory Love.

The romantic poet, John Keats, expressed this very simply in the "Ode to a Nightingale" and the "Ode on a Grecian Urn". Communing historic relations with Nature, the singing nightingale expresses the melodic symphony of Cosmos.

In the poem, social -- that is, beautiful and truthful -- happiness are being contrasted with the dead weight of ahistoric, patrian, labour grief, of misery and poverty. The song of the nightingale artistically and dialogically expresses immortal, social, historic life.

It is still dark, the "darkest before dawn", yet its emancipatory message to all "lovers" is very clear:

"Beauty is truth, truth beauty, -- that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know."

Yes, John Keats, a cosmic "thing of beauty is a joy forever"; certainly, "it can never pass into (labouring) nothingness".

Now, within the context of our Philosophic Science, what is Beauty, what exactly is the study of Beauty? Our questioning answer: It's the stringent study, the active investigation, the praxical analysis of Cosmos, of Nature, of our corporeal body; affirming and identifying its esthetic activities and objectives.

In nuce, among other component entities, Esthetics -- (differentiating it from market and religious Aesthetics), supported by and related to our Epistemology, Logics and Aethics (differentiating it from business Ethics and globalized Morality), -- is the Study of Cosmic, of Natural Beauty.

Thus, what is Beauty?

Logically, it is that which naturally delights all the senses, is physical loveliness, is that relation which exalts us as a healthy, natural body and a sane, social mind, striving towards emancipatory elegance and historic excellence.

In everyday life, Beauty may include some of the following, but not necessarily so: the beautiful and the ugly, the slime and the sublime, the banausic and the elegant; good taste, criticism, fine art, contemplation, sensuous enjoyment, carnal delicacies, goodies and nighties of the market, charisma and charm.

How do we enjoy beauty? What is an esthetic experience?

Which life experiences are definitely esthetic?

We could only repeat what we stated before; certainly, they are not the fundamental pillars of Labour, the infernal four D's:

Depredation (economic exploitation);

Domination (political repression, the State);

Discrimination (social prejudice, racism);

Deprivation (alienation).

Now, let the fatherland, the patria, illustrate to us what is gruesome, systemic beauty at rest; what is frozen, morbid, moribund aesthetics. Many a philosophic thinker tried very hard to spotlight beauty, but, in East and West, North and South, labour -- slavery, feudalism and capitalism -- progressively darkened the esthetic horizzon, ushered in eternal "dark ages" of arrogance, ignorance, obscurantism and bigotry.

Hence, beauty, already nearly converted into merchandise, fled this macabre scene, towards safer historic spheres.

Now and then, in faraway emancipatory realms, at the utmost outer edges of space and time, void of all forms of foreign tourism and alienated boredom, in invisible, invulnerable, invincible flowery gardens and meadows, we could still hear its beautiful nightingales, its charming, enchanting love-birds, eternally bewitching and inspiring us with their natural, beautiful, pandemonic symphonies.

Progressively, ideology is taking its toll; today, in the age of information, in globalized "communication", the bell tolls for all, ushering in a commonwealth of beautiful "common sense". As explained before, our connotation of Beauty transcends all these idealistic, spiritual, systemic, globalized aesthetic notions.

-----ooOoo-----
 

**************************************************************

INTRODUCING OUR SUBJECTIVE, TRUTH

EDUCATION, SEMANTICS, LOGIC & TRUTH

By Franz J. T. Lee

JUNE 5, 2001

**************************************************************

What is Truth?

What is true?

We are afraid that this might be a boring topic for many a one. Why discuss something like that? Are there not more important concrete things to do and to talk about?

And yet, this theme is one of the most existential issues that a "human being" could ever imagine. Everybody knows what is true, but when you tell anybody the truth, nobody wants to hear it, can understand it.

This shows to what fatal levels mental indoctrination and manipulation have reached already. How successful ideology nurtured from the cradle to the grave, till the feet of God, has been!

Now just think what would happen in this world, if everybody knows what any capitalist or businessman is really doing; what the huge pharmaceutical industries, the Life Sciences, are all producing; if everybody knows what all States covertly are organizing; why documents are classified; what really is happening in space, where all the "Flying Saucers" come from, where AIDS and MAD COW DISEASE really came from; what functions racism really has, why women are "inferior" to men; why we have an international "non-smoking" day; why the majority of "human beings" have lost their "human rights", and why they become crazy, etc., etc.

And yet, who will sit down and chat about such a stupid, nonsensical theme, about Truth? Most people would rather attend an exciting show, preferably "bull-fighting"; most intellectuals will attend some UNO international conference on "poverty reduction". Of course, only a mad "crew" that is totally out of its mind, will interest itself for philosophic veracity. Who ever developed Subjectives? The only thing around is a clear objective.

And the objectives are straight, straightforward, concrete: exploitation, domination, discrimination and depression. Which business, which State, which "human being" does not have these objectives? To have a job, to be exploited; to make money, to shop till you drop, to buy till you die, to hate your neighbour more than thyself? About a transjective, only theologians and religious fanatics have dreamt until now.

Discussing our Subjective, Truth, aletheia, veritas, verdad, Wahrheit, is not an easy intellectual enterprise. We will need ultra-high concentration and a "pedantic" circumspection to grasp all its intricate relations and intriguing problems; so, you are fore-warned -- please, switch to "advanced trinary mode". Don't forget, that in the same way as Applied Mathematics or Theoretical Physics, have complex terms and demand stringent scientific precision, similarly, our Science & Philosophy has complex, complicated, vague and opaque terms and relations.

However, as you all know, daily praxis and theory make perfect, imperfect, and neither perfect nor imperfect; these are the "first-class distinguishing marks" of scientific, philosophic and emancipatory scholars.

Formal-logically, intellectual stumbling blocks you either take or you leave them; but, if you do take them, then you have to enjoy them to the bitter "end". Already expressing a certain truth, we simply insist: Neither to take them Nor to leave them? That is our answering question, but also our questioning answer. I will give you a brief, highly concentrated but extremely condensed synopsis of our conception of Truth. Next week in more detail, we will discuss our Diagory, Truth, that is, Beauty a n d Truth, in the context of our Transjective "Beauty a n d Truth AND Love.

Also, just now we will indicate what the labour world understands by Truth; and you could rest assured that its laureates did not take the issue lightly; their gigantic "think tanks", like Kant or Hegel, did a pretty "good" job.

With due respect, we hail all these scientists, thinkers and experts, from whom we could definitely learn very much, and we have no problem with their discoveries, works and truths, provided that they respect ours also, no matter how "crazy" our efforts might seem to them. Their "truths" express real universal "labour" truths, and we would be fools to deny this obvious fact.

Today my customary introduction has to be somewhat more detailed than usual. Please, be patient! Thus, "fasten your philosophic belts", take your "Matte Tea" or

"Bob-Coffee", or "start smoking", but, please, be careful, don't burn your neurological transistors, ... Neither Up Nor Down, and away we go!!!

So, there we are, reaching cruising speed, second to none; stringently, scientifically a n d philosophically, we will now attempt to illustrate the contents, range and limits of formal-logical, absolute, unilateral, unilinear, unimensional, universal "Truths". Hegel said it: In this world, the True One is the Whole One -- and the Whole is only One, the One and Only Whole, the True One. And, truly, truly, verily I say unto thee: this One is monolithic, monotheistic, monointellectualistic, monorationalistic Labour alias Capital; it is the whole monopolistic Man, universal Alienation.

There in nothing more unique, more lonely, more lonesome than Man, the labouring animal. This is his Truth, his Whole Truth, his Truthful Whole, his Alienation, his Story, his History, his Rest, his Peace, his Rest In Peace, his Death. Homo sapiens sapiens is the "lonely crowd".

Of course, we have nothing against anybody studying the origin, the centre, the left, the right and the end of the Universe, but to pretend that this is the only "verse", the only one to be learnt by heart, well, that's another grim Platonic story, another gruesome "Brother Grimm" fairy tale. To disseminate all these as democratic "education", that is a transhistoric crime against life on this planet.

Thus, in unveiling the poliversal Truth, we will leave no relevant cosmic stone unturned.

So, folks, please, follow very slowly and carefully that what I am trying to elaborate and illustrate now. It is just experimental, just an infinitesimal "peep hole", not necessarily the "Whole Truth".

"Once upon a time ... ", we have explained that simple, cosmic, natural, scientific questions should be answered just like that: namely, simply and straightforwardly; that ontic, social, philosophic issues are complex, compound, complicated.

And that transcendental, transhistoric, transsystemic matters are extremely perplex and multiplex, are vague and opaque; hence, they are real adamant epistemological nuts to crack; probably, only attempted by audacious, conscientious emancipators. To mix up these levels, degrees and mensions, logically, will truly lead to catastrophic intellectual confusion and disastrous rational obscurantism.

Let us commence our transhistoric sojourn through the educational wilderness of the fatherland, beginning with "semantics", then we will move on to aletheic semantic theory, then further on to metalogical theory of belief, of belief systems, eventually approaching the Buddha, and the Ancient Indian Vedas.

We will terminate with the brilliant Arab philosopher, Ibn al-'Arabi, with Parmenides' "Way Of Truth", and, finally, we will return again to our subjective conception of Truth.

Certainly, it is a long, arduous "bon voyage", but au fait I am sure you will enjoy the scientific flowery aroma, the aureated philosophic aura, the transhistoric majestic panorama.

Generally, when one pinpoints someone, demanding precision and incision, one is being accused of losing oneself in "semantics"; unfortunately, those who are afraid of bourgeois "semantics", who insist on concreteness, generally, do not even know its meaning and what relevance it has for the labour world.

By saying all this, of course, already we have surpassed all ideological, capitalistic referential or so-called aletheic semantics; we are applying our own trans-, multi- and poli-logic.

Also the majority of linguists and pedagogues, but also ideologues and demagogues, do not grasp the real significance of "semantic" tools in the formation and formulation of accurate ideas or irrefutable thoughts, i.e., they are not intellectually equipped to philosophize with a sharp, incisive mental razor blade, guided by a multi-directional, poliversal compass, and supported by a critical, stringent laser-eraser.

They mostly forget that the most difficult thing for a philosopher to accomplish is precisely to think, to translate, to transcribe thoughts into fertile, fluent words, viz., to communicate, to relate Truth. And not everybody necessarily has been educated to think, to theorize, to verify, to transmit veritas. Billions only get their "true knowledge", their "absolute truth", their "objective, scientific truth", from the infallible alma mater or from in vino veritas, from "Bread and Games", from there where the wine is "in", and the wit (intelligence, intellect and reason) is "out".

Thinking is a precious ontic, existential, social jewel that we won't find in the proverbial "haystack"; I would rather suggest that we as dust, as stardust, truthfully search for it at the bottom of all the oceans of the earth; moreover, in the unknown, infinitely twinkling skies; furthermore, in the opaque, transspheric Magellanic Clouds.

Concerning the aletheic semantic theory, in the 1930s, it was expressed at best by the Polish-born mathematician and logician Alfred Tarski. He even went so far as to coin a semantic formula for Truth (T), in which "p" is a variable representing any sentence and "X" is a variable representing the name, or unique description of that sentence.

Simplified, here are two examples: "A "nigger is black" is true if, and only if, a nigger is black. "A pale-faced European is white" is true if, and only if, a pale-faced European is white.

At any event, I already see the Mephistophelic smiles on your faces, a pity that we don't have cyber camcorders! Whatever the case may be, we all know that many significant utterances of natural language do not necessarily fall into this logical straightjacket, are not true or false at all; thus, let us advance and rather see what these fervent metalogicians have to tell us more about truth definition in any given language.

I'm not going to explain here what this sophistry, this hair-splitting, is all about, You all have studied Logic during your Social Science academic careers. I just want to indicate how the well-acquainted "laws" of formal logic are applied here; just look at the following examples.

1. A closed atomic sentence is true if and only if it is true in the intuitive sense; for example, 0 = 0 is true, 0 + 1 = 0 is false.

2. A closed sentence A is true if and only if A is not true.

3. A closed sentence A B is true if and only if either A nor B is true.

4. A closed sentence ()A() is true if and only if A() is true for every value of --i.e., if A(0), A(1), A(1 + 1), . . . are aall true.

Anyhow, don't bother yourselves trying to decipher this sphingid nothingness; don't wreck your brains on these universal semantic rocks! They are all so-called "inductive" definitions of Truth. Of course, in the precise scientific-philosophic elaboration of our Poli-Logic, we will have to use similar very complicated symbols to express intellectually and rationally the complex and compound relations of Beauty, Truth and Love, of our Esthetics a n d Aethics AND Exotics.

However, to blow all this formal-meta-logical crap into universal non-related atoms, just use the following dialectical or dialogical sentences: "I - the semantic metalogician - am a liar", or, "This sentence is not true." Now, when we apply them to the aforesaid, what would still remain "true" about the "laws" quoted above, about their logic? Socrates already dialectically and rhetorically undermined these semantic fallacies.

Believe it or not, there even exists a logical theory of belief. Let's look at applied formal logic, at epistemic logic. It is favourably used by ideologues and demagogues, that is, mainly by politicians, to compile modern "Newspeak", to develop global ideology.

Furthermore, it is one of the major logical pillars of postmodern education. Instead of dealing with labour reality, it relates to what people have been taught to know and to what they believe in or maintain or doubt to be the case of a specific issue, in a nut-shell, to their belief systems.

And exactly this indoctrinated pseudo-logical theory of belief, Tom, Dick and Harry fervently launch against us in their daily verbal attacks, and in defence of their sublimated labour irreality. They won't even notice that, just like Don Albert, we just do not "believe", that we can't believe, that we have no "belief system" at all. They depart from themselves, and only see themselves, and nothing more. Aletheic logic, at least, tries to find some kind of truth; but this modern globalized

metalogic has nothing to with truth whatsoever anymore. As Isaac B. Tabata, a South African revolutionary, once said, it is "Education For Barbarism", the recipe for Mental Slavery.

Summing up, this metaphysical, metalogical theory assumes that everybody has a belief, that (s)he is subject to logical compulsion, that (s)he has a limited logical computerizedvision, and that (s)he is permanently myopic, arguing that nobody is omniscient, that nobody possesses the eternal globalized "absolute truths", the absolute information of our age. Who really wants to know every little tit-bit, bite and byte of this globalized already massively intoxicated ideological garbage?

The crucial truth is that in this democratic, peace-loving labour world of "Liberty,

Equality & Fraternity" practically nearly everybody has the same ideological, systemic"belief", the same universal formal logical vision, and this has nothing to do with "science" or "omniscience".

For example, billions believe that this exploitative, dominating, discriminating and alienating world order can ONLY be changed from WITHIN. For this "democratic", "peaceful" intrasystemic transformation they work, they live, they sacrifice their lives, they die.

The only thing that they actually achieve is that they give the static "New World Order", give the "next" and "new" economy, give the closed world system, another chance to survive,, to buy more "time", to buy an innovative, renovative extra lease of life.

Now, let us leave these formal-logical "truth-values" and "truth-tables" behind us, and see whether we could learn anything about the Truth elsewhere. Transhistorically, crossing the millennia, the continents and the oceans, we are now heading for Ancient "Mother India".

Let's listen to the Buddha, and begin to understand why all his statues are being pillaged and destroyed nowadays. At least, he still contemplated on the dhamma, on the Way of Truth. About four weeks after his famous "Enlightenment", comfortably sitting under a banyan tree, the Buddha thought to himself: ...

"I have realized this Truth which is deep, difficult to see, difficult to understand . . .comprehensible by the wise. Men who are overpowered by passion and surrounded by a mass of darkness cannot see this Truth which is against the current, which is lofty, deep, subtle and hard to comprehend."

So far, so good! D'accord! We said it before already, that Thinking, that Truth is extremely difficult to see, very complicated to understand. However, what follows now is even more beautiful, more truthful. At last, now we are even Buddhists! What a strange metamorphosis we are undergoing? Imagine, now we are obsolete "coolies"!

Well, we are philosophically just "cool"!!

Then, although the archaic, universal medium remains Thalean hydor, water, the ancient deity, the Brahman Sahampati, taught the Buddha about the various levels, degrees and mensions of Truth:

"In a lotus pond there are some lotuses still under water; there are others that have risen only up to the water level; and there are still others that stand above water and are untouched by it. In a similar way, in this world there are people of different levels of development."

Excellent! Simply fantastic!!

In his first sermon, the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta ("Sermon on Setting in Motion the Wheel of Truth"), at Isipatana, now called Sarnath, the Buddha expounded more views about the Truth. Folks, study Hindi -- the flowing "theosophic" words are as long as the Ganges!!

Like Aristotle, he discovered the "middle path", the Noble Eightfold Path, towards vision, knowledge, to truth, to nirvana. Well, Pandemonium Crew, let us learn what it is all about! Who knows, if we leave the "rightfulness" aside, it could be of scientific and philosophic aletheic significance.

It consists of right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right mode of living, right endeavour, right mindfulness, and right concentration.
 

Emancipatory Voyage Towards Transcendental Love

By Franz J. T. Lee

11th June, 2001

Previously, we dealt with the Affirmation, Beauty, and the Negation, Beauty a n d Truth. For us, the Superation of Beauty a n d Truth, i.e., neither Beauty nor Truth, excels as Love. Take note: Neither-Nor is not a normative, or even "negative" operation; it is a logical, methodological "take off".

In other words, Emancipatory Historic Love encompasses the intensive "contradiction", Beauty a n d Truth, but it surpasses it. It is more, has a surplus, an extra; it has an intensive-extensive, transcendental, transjective trajectory.

But, beforehand, firstly, here we have a precise, incisive revision. Our cosmic Objective is praxical, scientific, natural Beauty. Our ontic Subjective exists as ontic, theoretic, philosophic, social Beauty a n d Truth. Our transcendental Transjective surpasses as excellent, emancipatory, historic Love, as Beauty a n d Truth AND Love.

Also, secondly, please note: Love is an extremely stringent, scientific, philosophic and emancipatory Triagory (not category); its connotation has nothing to do with "erotic love", "sexual love", with Cupid, Casanova or Romeo, with perverse sex tourism.

u contraire, it is related to Gaia, Minerva, Athena, Isis, to vis vitalis and orgone -- to that what is being destroyed permanently by labour, by depravation, domination, discrimination and depression.

As we have seen, our Objective concerns Esthetics, the study of Beauty, and it should not be confounded with Patrian Aesthetics. Our Subjective deals with Aethics, thus being differentiated from Labour Ethics. Our Transjective excels as Exotics, differentiated from Labour Erotics. Individually but also in combined and triverse fashion, we will elaborate all these in "future" discussions.

We will now continue with the discussion dealing specifically with our cosmic Objective (Beauty), our ontic Subjective (Truth) and our excellent Transjective (Love). All these logically together compose our Triagory: Love. As Love, we encounter the "contradiction", we say, the Diagory, Beauty and Truth, but also its superation, its Neither-Nor, Love itself. Thus logically, there excels no Love, without Beauty a n d Truth.

Thirdly, what is sold in the Patria, the hocus-pocus called "love", is not our topic here. Also the gift of the "Holy Ghost", "love", or "God is Love", are all extraterrestrial nonentities here. Furthermore, "love thy neighbour as thyself", this ideological, moral, religious "catch phrase" is alien to our science and philosophy.

Of course, our topic concerns vague, opaque, transcendental worlds and spheres. Thus, put on your excellent, invisible, invulnerable, invincible "battle array", to enter the "unknown", that de facto is an emancipatory mension so very near and dear to us.

We will talk about "more" pleasant things, about things what we seldom did before, about what we rarely ever think about, and about matters that from now on would occupy and preoccupy our minds permanently far beyond the current, official space and time barriers, levels and degrees.

Until now, this mension where we neither act nor think is spatially-temporally occupied by nihilism and belief. Formal-logically, until now, in transcending mode, in one word, dying, we either fell (descended) into the bottomless black pit of gaping nothingness or into the glowing arms of the Devil, of the fiery Prince of Darkness, or we arose (ascended) to the eternal, brilliant light and glory of God, to The Father Almighty, to utopian heavenly paradises.

Across the millennia, these were the only fake "Neither-Nor" options left to all of us by the patrian, universal labour world, blessed as "atheism", "satanism", "communism", "revelation", "redemption", "salvation", "religion" or "belief".

Without really reflecting on what we are saying, most of us just simply "believe" in all sorts of divine fairy or hellish nightmare tales. Just like trained parrots, the whole blessed day and damned night we ruminate ad infinitum et absolutum: "I believe that ...". Just listen to your social environment, to the Radio or TV, or read the newspapers or any "classical" literature and you will see exactly what we mean.

Hence, very few earth-dwellers have learned to surpass officially controlled servile acting and sterile thinking itself, and to excel towards hidden, forbidden, erotic meadows, to graze in eviternal, evergreen exotic pastures, frolicking towards the beautiful gardens of innovative, renovative spheres of neither-acting-nor-thinking; thus, being capitated and capacitated to express these beauties and truths verbally with natural cooing and wooing, intercommunicating and extrarelating them historically with tender social caresses.

In fact, without even being aware of this galactic tragedy, within formal-logical, spatial-temporal, ideological-universal parameters, the absolute majority of "mankind" find themselves physically and mentally violated, culturally caged in, traditionally manacled, educationally enslaved, religiously emasculated and humanly alienated. They do not have the slightest notion of all that is happening around them.

This exotic, lovely, loving mension, described before, has nothing to do with "laurels", "oscars", "book prizes", with "chosen people", "elites" or "Illuminati". It does not concern "conscientization", "education", "conversion", "recruitment", "facts", not with "manipulation", "indoctrination", "bamboozling" or "brainwashing" of anything, of anybody.

It is not related to "intellectual grandeur" or "intellectual property", not connected to wild golden goose chasing in university libraries, with desperate, fanatic searches on the Web to find at all costs, by trial and error, by hook or crook, some idol, some fan, some "great man", perhaps, an intellectual information entrepreneur, who could offer his academic "clients" a supermarket full of postmodern "grand ideas" about beauty, truth and love.

E contrario, wisely interchanging the order of "truth-values" and setting the "truth-tables" of "intellectual surplus value" into epicurean parameters of galactic genius and merit, -- if any "discovery" should be necessary at all, -- then, the "great ones", whose Latin already has reached obsolete "death" levels, desperately would have to "search" for us on the whole Internet, in the breadth and width of Cyberspace, across the whole "Information Age", in the living, loving heart of the Magellanic Clouds.

Who is interested in our Science and Philosophy will find us, just as we found ourselves too. Thus, please put your mind -- which can do much more than just acting, thinking and believing in absolute, absolutist, unilateral, unilinear, universal things -- into "trinary, triverse, neither-nor excellent mode", and let us continue discussing the excellent, exciting, exotic topic: EROS alias LOVE.

Let's put the complex, complicated "philosophic" labour irreality and surreality aside; we know what Greek mythology, what Plato and Empedocles all had to say about Cupid and Eros. Also we are acquainted with the "erotic" conceptions of other philosophers like Shakespeare, Goethe, Feuerbach or Marcuse. Let's go on a rapid adventurous, vacational, transhistoric "bon voyage", leaving Ibiza, Mallorca, Disney Land, Hiroshima, Rwanda, Fort Knox, Atlantic City and the Taj Mahal far behind us.

What follows now has nothing to do with Cloud-Cuckoo-Land, Wonderland, pipe dreams, revelations or wishful thinking! What we are attempting to illustrate is derived directly from our Logic and Epistemology, from our Science, Philosophy and Emancipation. It is just a simple illustration, not the "gospel truth", and it is truly not valid for other world outlooks or Weltanschauungen.

With one foot in the Patria and the other one in History, just for the sake of verbal clarification, of making our points very clear, we will now use spatial and temporal language expressions; in reality, we need other "relating tools"; however, only having "Hobson's choice" for the "time being", we'll stick to some obsolete linguistic illustrations. In this sense, let's switch to transhistoric "present tense", to here and now.

We find ourselves in Beautiful Nature a n d Truthful Society, where everything is young, frolicking, splashing, sprouting and germinating, being neither at rest nor in motion. Eviternal, neither evergreen nor evercrimson , NeitherSummer-NorWinter, simply lovely, loveable AutumnSpring ushers in this exotic, erotic transhistoric panorama.

We see original rock paintings all over; painted in variegated colours never ever seen before; nowhere a Rembrandt, a Picasso, in sight, no portrayal of labour misery anywhere around. The melodic symphony of the multifarious spheres, never ever heard before, is tantalizing us, bewitching us; everybody and everything, except spirits, devils and souls, participate, accompany us everywhere, anyhow, anywhere, anywhither.

No "sciences", no "arts", no "humanities", no "chemistry", no "sex or flex appeal"; no "business", no "university", no "church bells", no "Holy Mass", no universality, just exotic, natural-social, historic things and relations inspire us to aspire to reach for the evertwinkling stars.

No time, no space. No life, no death. Neither do the "living" die nor do the "dead" live. No God, no Devil; no Heavenly Father, no Virgin Mother; no Pope, no Hope; no angel, no saint; no human being, no human bum; except, of course, the humming of the bumble-bees; no mugs, no bugs, no humbugs, no Bugs Bunny; truly, just erotic hugs and exotic kisses!

The different cellular, plant, insect, animal, human and other "species" relate to each other. They give birth to each other; in their own delicious poliversal "All Seasons" restaurant, they take a "cool" sip from their profulgent, profluent natural rivers, they intra-, extra-, ultra- and supra-exchange themselves, relate their particles, particulars, atoms and universes, their "energy" and orgone, their forms, formations and formulations, their flavoury essences and savoury existences, into emancipatory transcendences.

Everywhere they have amiable visitors from their amicable ambience, from the unfathomable profundities of the oceans, to the obscure caves of the earth, from the endless friendly clouds and winds, to other planets, stars and galaxies. This causes no problem, all of them are made of twinkling, brilliant "star dust"; they all aspire to the stars, including their own. They all accelerate their levels, they stimulate their degrees, and they oscillate their mensions of essence, existence and transcendence.

So-called Homo habilis, Homo kenyapithecus, Homo sapiens, Homo neanderthal, all play together with their exotic, polychrome kith and erotic, multi-coloured kin, with the smiling gorillas, teasing chimpanzees, playing apes and screaming monkeys; here, no physical difference, no social discrimination, no divine paradise, no hellish apartheid, no fascist world order exist. Neither Egoism Nor Communism, Neither Capitalism Nor Socialism, Neither Peace Nor War.

All beings and existences have no "needs", no "necessities", inter alia, they only have beautiful, truthful, loving relations; it is not pertinent to fulfil any goal, "objective" or aim; nobody works, neither the ant nor the bee, neither ape nor ape-man, nor man-ape, nor man. All know where in the bosom of Nature their shelter, food and drinks are; and they have no social problem in finding them, they do not need to produce, to reproduce anything, not even procreating themselves.

Man catches a wild boar, eventually he roasts it; the lion devours a delicious, lumpy "ape-man"; the worms organize a grand festival from the crispy left-overs, kindly baked in the crimson sun, that smiles from delightful, azure skies, now and then, it´s scorching some leaves, to make natural humus for the plants and trees.

All quite natural, quite social, quite historic. No problem, nothing new really, even in this formal-logical godforlorn labour world, everybody or anything "dies" some time in some place-- even the brutal CIA-hound-dogs that devour sweet "terrorist"-foxes daily.

In beautiful, true History, there exists no hunger, thirst, smallpox, aids, cancer, envy, greed, competition, egoism, sexual harassment; in Love, no fear, exploitation, domination, discrimination, alienation -- everybody and everything just enjoy its/her/his/their natural, social, historic relations, themselves.

They need no theatre, no cinema, no fair, they tell each other stories about themselves, about volcanoes, the sun, the full moon, snakes and lions, about their physical abilities, about their psychic capabilities, about their PSI-factors, -- nothing about "his story", not about "history" -- also nothing about Alexander The Great, Charles The Great, Gregory The Great, Jahwe, Moses, Mohammed, Jesus Christ, Allah, Buddha or God The Great Father.

Nobody is interested in the year 666 AD or BC, it does not concern anybody or anything; nobody is really interested in the age of the universe, in its beginning or end, in its size, breadth, depth, centre or width; they themselves, all are universes, diverses, triverses, multi- and poli-verses.

Nobody fears Armageddon, Entropy, Moloch; nobody yearns for the coming "Happy Hunting Grounds", for the "Promised Land", for "Wonderland", Utopia, Fatherland, Nirvana, Heaven; for Home, Sweet Home, everything and everybody is at home, is home itself, is Love, and is, exists and excels, beyond unilinear-unilateral, spatial-temporal, universal-absolutist barriers, far yonder, much, much more.

Nothing, nobody is "educated" by anyone or anything, needs any "education", any authority, any super-ego, any law, any order, any State at all. Everything is cosmic science, exists ontic philosophy, transcends exotic emancipation, and far beyond ...

Whether we really are all educated, sentimental, sentient, sapient "human beings", the "chosen people", the "crown of creation", the "highest blossom of nature", I really would not know; it could be, but also it may not necessarily be so. That is why we illustrate other and yet another historic excellencies.

Summa summarum: In Love, as Transjective, here is a n d exists AND excels Neither Past Nor Future, Neither Quid Nor Quo, just Transitiveness, Transrelationality, Transversality, Transhistoricity, Transgalacticity, a Non-Present Hic et Nunc, void of any genre of temporal boredom and spatial carpe diem.

Here is, exists and transcends very simply: exotic Nothing, erotic Nothingness. Love excels, exceeds, transcends as Nothingness. In this sense: omnia vincit amor.

Everybody and everything is excelling itself, surpassing herself, transcending himself, loving themselves. Essence and Existence exist simply excellently. Transhistoric Beings and Existences AND Transcendences sprout like flavoury, savoury mushrooms all across the worlds of worlds, poliverses of poliverses, spheres of spheres.

Certainly, we cannot grasp many a thing, our actions and thoughts have limits, also they have no limits, and also they have neither limits nor no limits. For sure, our current earthly socialization and educational process have reduced the limit of the actions and thoughts of billions, as "wretched of the earth", who do not belong to the "power elitist race", to an infinitesimal negligible level.

Returning to the "fatherland", its members of the so-called "human race" find themselves in different "spaces", "times", levels of action, degrees of consciousness and mensions of "globalization" and "galactization".

Some live only on even levels; others live on these, but also on some uneven degrees of consciousness; others, a very few, live on all these, but also on combined mensions of historic transcendence.

Thus, de facto, the whole planet, the whole solar system finds itself not in an energy but in a multifarious transitive crisis; involving even unicosmic worlds, uneven universal ontic outlooks, and combined transcendental spheres.

******************************************************************

 

A "VISION" OF EMANCIPATION

By Franz J. T. Lee

 Well, there you have a glimpse of emancipatory history and of historic emancipation.

We formulate our Cosmic Beauty a n d Ontic Truth AND transcendental Love as follows:

Beauty a n d Truth AND Love.

In this way, we could excel our Labour Platonic "Vision" and see the Historic Light at the end of the dark tunnel of the New World Order.

-----oOo-----